Prince Harry turns up to High Court in Associated Newspapers hearingon March 27, 2023 at 10:30 am

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

The Duke of Sussex has accused the publisher of the Daily Mail of unlawful information gathering.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

The Duke of Sussex has unexpectedly appeared at the High Court as legal proceedings begin in a privacy case.

Prince Harry and other individuals are suing Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL), publishers of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday.

The duke, singer Sir Elton John and actresses Sadie Frost and Liz Hurley are among the individuals who allege unlawful information gathering.

The publisher has described the allegations as “preposterous smears”.

A four-day preliminary High Court hearing, starting on Monday, will consider legal arguments and a judge will decide whether the case will go any further.

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, arrives at the High Court in London, Britain March 27, 2023

Image source, Reuters

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, arrives at the High Court in London, Britain March 27, 2023

Image source, Reuters

When the legal action was announced in October, law firm Hamlins, which is representing Prince Harry and Frost, alleged that ANL’s activity included:

  • “The hiring of private investigators to secretly place listening devices inside people’s cars and homes
  • “The commissioning of individuals to surreptitiously listen into and record people’s live, private telephone calls whilst they were taking place
  • “The payment of police officials, with corrupt links to private investigators, for inside, sensitive information
  • “The impersonation of individuals to obtain medical information from private hospitals, clinics, and treatment centres by deception
  • “The accessing of bank accounts, credit histories and financial transactions through illicit means and manipulation”

In a statement released at the time, the newspaper group said: “We utterly and unambiguously refute these preposterous smears which appear to be nothing more than a pre-planned and orchestrated attempt to drag the Mail titles into the phone hacking scandal concerning articles up to 30 years old.

“These unsubstantiated and highly defamatory claims – based on no credible evidence – appear to be simply a fishing expedition by claimants and their lawyers, some of whom have already pursued cases elsewhere.”

- Advertisement -

Discover

Sponsor

Latest

Prince Andrew asks US court to dismiss caseon October 30, 2021 at 4:14 am

The royal's lawyers argue Virginia Giuffre failed to sufficiently state her claims and is seeking a "payday".The filing says Ms Giuffre settled sex trafficking...

Cuomo says it’s ‘shocking’ most new coronavirus hospitalizations are people who had been staying home

KEY POINTS Early look at data from 100 New York hospitals shows that 66% of new admissions related to the virus are people who...

Insulation: £1bn funding for least efficient homeson November 28, 2022 at 12:02 am

Government announces extra funding to help those in least efficient homes in lower council tax bands.Image source, Getty ImagesAn extra £1bn will be spent...

Nadhim Zahawi committed a serious breach of ministerial code, says Sunakon January 29, 2023 at 3:45 pm

Nadhim Zahawi is sacked as Tory Party chairman after an inquiry finds he failed to disclose investigation into his tax affairs.Image source, EPANadhim Zahawi...

Why has Sue Gray’s report not yet appeared?on January 27, 2022 at 1:12 pm

Political correspondent Iain Watson looks at what the long-anticipated report is likely to find when it appears.Image source, EPAThe expectation across Whitehall is that...