The Vision Fund’s Method Of Valuing Companies Looks A Bit Off

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Morning Markets: News that WeWork’s leading investor is ready to ditch its controversial CEO is notable. Most investors leave founders alone. But when another SoftBank Vision Fund bet looks sideways, drastic times call for unconventional methods.

Subscribe to the Crunchbase Daily

As The We Company (WeWork) stumbles towards an IPO at a price far under its final private valuation, its leading investor is considering working to remove its CEO. The possible reduction in the internal authority of Adam Neumann, prior media darling and now international business pariah, is the biggest news of the weekend.

But there’s more going on at SoftBank’s Vision Fund, a key WeWork backer, that I wanted to highlight. More precisely, it seems that the investment group has made some mispriced bets in recent years. Let’s talk valuations for a minute.

Down

The Wall Street Journal published an excellent report this morning, observing that several SoftBank Vision Fund investments were either giving up gains or, in fact, losing money for their famous investor.

It appears that SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son is underwater on his Uber bet, and his various wagers into Slack are losing altitude as well. The Journal goes on to note that the Vision Fund’s investment into Guardant Health has lost value as well, “potentially requiring [the deal] to be marked down.”

It’s not hard, therefore, to look at the most valuable Vision Fund deals and spy weakness. I want to extend the point today by reminding ourselves of a few other deals that the Vision Fund took part in that I reckon are also underwater.

To jog your memory, three Vision Fund deals quickly came to mind this morning when I tried to recall what felt like the group’s least conservative bets:

Since then, Wag’s growth has come under questionBrandless’s CEO left, and I never had much hope that robotic pizza was going to wind up being the near-term future.

Naturally, these are just a handful of deals from a huge investment bucket. There will be winners in the Vision Fund 1 — LoggiCoupangAutomation Anywhere, perhaps — to offset other losses. But there are also some investments like WeWork and Zume that are more head-scratchers than wagers we understand.

What appears clear, however, is that a good chunk of the first Vision Fund’s deal makeup was either mispriced, fed too much capital, or both. That is not a recipe for success. But don’t trust your friendly local tech blogger. Listen to investor Keith Rabois talk to Kara Swisher earlier this year:

Home of Science
Follow me

- Advertisement -

Discover

Sponsor

Latest

The Ashes 2023: Brendon McCullum praises England’s ‘refined’ styleon August 1, 2023 at 11:02 am

England coach Brendon McCullum reiterates his wish for his side to stick to their attacking style after the drawn Ashes.England coach Brendon McCullum reiterates...

Three Palestinians killed in clashes with Israeli forces in West Bankon November 29, 2022 at 11:02 am

The men were reportedly shot by Israeli troops in two incidents, amid an upsurge in violence.Image source, ReutersBy David GrittenBBC NewsThree Palestinian men have...

World Cup 2022: Andre Ayew misses penalty for Ghanaon December 2, 2022 at 3:42 pm

Ghana miss a golden chance to take the lead against Uruguay as Andre Ayew see's his VAR penalty saved by Sergio Rochet.Ghana miss a...

Rural areas ‘hit harder’ by cost-of-living crisison September 22, 2022 at 6:39 am

People living in the countryside face higher costs than those in urban areas, a new report findsPeople living in the countryside face higher costs...

Qianlong-period Chinese vase, kept in kitchen, fetches almost £1.5mon May 18, 2022 at 11:16 am

The blue-glazed vase had been estimated to sell at auction for between £100,000-£150,000.Image source, DeweattsAn "extremely rare" 18th Century Chinese vase bought in the...
Home of Science
Follow me