Edward Colston statue case sent to Court of Appealon April 12, 2022 at 11:44 pm

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

The Attorney General is seeking clarification of the law after the Colston case leads to “uncertainty”.

Statue thrown in the harbour

Image source, PA Media

The acquittal of four people on trial for toppling Bristol’s Edward Colston statue has prompted the Attorney General to contact the Court of Appeal.

Suella Braverman is seeking clarification of the law around what can be used as a defence to criminal charges arising from protests.

She said the Colston case has led to “uncertainty” and asked for clarification on human rights defences.

The referral will not affect the acquittals in the case.

Milo Ponsford, 26, Rhian Graham, 30, Jake Skuse, 33, and Sage Willoughby, 22, were charged with criminal damage after the memorial to the slave trader was toppled on 7 June 2020.

(Left to right) Sage Willoughby, Jake Skuse, Milo Ponsford and Rhian Graham outside Bristol Crown Court

Image source, PA Media

They were cleared after a trial but the verdict prompted a debate about the criminal justice system after the defendants opted to stand trial in front of a jury and did not deny involvement in the incident.

The defendants claimed in court that the presence of a statue of a man involved in the slave trade was a hate crime and it was therefore not an offence to remove it.

The prosecution argued it was “irrelevant” who Colston was and the case was one of straightforward criminal damage.

The statue was stamped on after it was pulled down

Image source, PA Media

Ms Braverman has contacted the Court of Appeal concerning the scope of defences that can be used for criminal charges arising from protests and the directions which should be given to juries.

She said the case has caused uncertainty between the offence of criminal damage and the right to protest peacefully.

The Court of Appeal will be asked to clarify the law around whether someone can use a defence related to their human rights when they are accused of criminal damage.

‘Guardian of liberty’

“After careful consideration, I have decided to refer the Colston statue case to the Court of Appeal to clarify the law around protests,” said Ms Braverman.

“Trial by jury is an important guardian of liberty and critical to that are the legal directions given to the jury.

“It is in the public interest to clarify the points of law raised in these cases for the future.

“This is a legal matter which is separate from the politics of the case involved,” she added.

Presentational grey line

Follow BBC West on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Send your story ideas to: bristol@bbc.co.uk

- Advertisement -

Discover

Sponsor

Latest

Gareth Southgate: After a ‘Damaging & humiliating’ defeat, can England boss be a winner?on June 15, 2022 at 10:37 am

After England's humiliating loss to Hungary, BBC Sport's Phil McNulty analyses what it means for Gareth Southgate's future.After England's humiliating loss to Hungary, BBC...

Kane ‘totally involved’ in Spurs project – Conteon January 4, 2022 at 10:30 pm

Tottenham manager Antonio Conte says Harry Kane is "totally involved" in his project at Spurs after it appeared the striker would leave last summer.

Gary Ballance: Yorkshire release ex-England batter from contracton December 8, 2022 at 11:54 am

Yorkshire release ex-England batter Gary Ballance from his contract, two years before it was due to end.Yorkshire release ex-England batter Gary Ballance from his...

Marriage certificate to include mothers’ names in England and Waleson May 4, 2021 at 12:20 am

Both parents, not just the father, will now be named on marriage certificates in England and Wales.image copyrightGetty ImagesMothers of brides and grooms in...

Jaipur Novels – Aisha

The series of scenes, which took place in London, takes us to the court of Khalid on a former King's yacht. It is there...