Marmite-owner Unilever bids for GSK’s consumer armon January 15, 2022 at 3:41 pm

Unilever made an offer of about £50bn to buy Glaxo Smith Kline’s consumer goods arm in late 2021, it has emerged.

It means the owner of Marmite, Persil and PG Tips hopes to soon own more household brands including Sensodyne toothpaste and Panadol.

If the sale went ahead, analysts say it would be one of the biggest ever deals involving London-listed firms.

The Sunday Times, which first reported the move, said GSK rejected the bid for being too low.

GSK is already preparing to separate its consumer goods division from its pharmaceutical business in the middle of this year.

The company has come under pressure from investors for failing to develop a Covid vaccine.

Unilever said in a statement the GSK consumer arm “would be a strong strategic fit as Unilever continues to reshape its portfolio”.

The consumer goods giant, which became a fully British company in 2020 after previously being separated between the UK and the Netherlands, also approached Pfizer about the potential deal, since the American pharmaceutical giant owns a 34% stake in GSK’s consumer goods business.

Neither GSK nor Pfizer has any ideological objection to selling to Unilever. GSK had planned to spin off its consumer business later this year anyway through a demerger creating a separate publicly listed company but always said it would have an open mind to a trade sale to another party if the price was right.

GSK’s problem with the Unilever bid is that the price isn’t right.

Both Barclays and Goldman Sachs analysts have valued the business at around £50bn. However, that does not include a few important things.

First, the premium you would normally expect to pay for taking control of a business – somewhere in the range of 30% – although that might be reduced by the debt of about £10bn GSK was expected to leave on the books of the consumer business.

Second, the value of the cost savings GSK admits could be made to make the business more profitable.

Third, it may not reflect the higher sales growth targets GSK boss Emma Walmsley has said are possible for the business.

She has also said the benefit of a demerger is current GSK shareholders would get shares in the demerged business so retain their participation in any future growth in the consumer business.

Some will say if higher growth and greater cost reductions are possible, why haven’t they happened already? Emma Walmsley has been in charge for more than four years. That’s one of the questions activist shareholder Elliot Management has implicitly asked by encouraging other shareholders to agitate for a more radical greater break up of one of the UK’s most valuable companies.

The BBC understands the very different ideas on what this business is worth means there are no active and ongoing discussions between GSK and Unilever.

But Unilever’s intentions are very clear.

The “for sale” sign is now very visible and the elbows will get sharper as this basket of household consumer goods gets closer to the checkout.

Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said Unilever’s CEO Alan Jope was under pressure because the business had recently missed targets for sales and profit margins.

“Unilever has strong cashflow, but the heat is on Mr Jope. He wants to be seen to do something,” Mr Mould said.

“But this is a high risk deal. Many investors see GSK as underperforming. But at a time when inflation is rising, consumer goods with loyal customers represent a good way for firms to try to manage profits.”

GSK has said it is in late stage trails of a Covid vaccine it was developing with the French pharmaceutical firm, Sanofi.

GSK reported overall sales of £34bn in 2020, £10bn of which was from its consumer goods business.

Other brands in the division include Centrum vitamins, Aquafresh toothpaste and Nicorette gum.