Early indications Irish referendums could be loston March 9, 2024 at 1:42 pm

Counting is continuing after two referendums were held on family and care in the Republic of Ireland.

Early indications show that both referendums could be defeated.

The votes, held on International Women’s Day, sought views on amending two parts of the Irish constitution.

One change could alter the definition of family to include those not based on marriage, while the other could remove reference to women in the home.

Green Party Leader Eamon Ryan who campaigned for the changes, said it looked like both questions would be defeated.

Mr Ryan said: “It does look like a no vote in both the family and care referendums.

“The first thing to say is that we respect that. It’s the voice of the people and in our constitution, it’s the people who are sovereign.

“It’s they who decide what goes into our constitution.”

Mr Ryan, who was at the RDS count centre in Dublin said: “If it is a no vote in both, we will have to respect that.”

Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald was jeered by a small crowd and called “a traitor to the Irish people” as she arrived at Dublin Castle on Saturday.

Her party advocated for a “yes-yes” vote but she said the government had “come up short in terms of the caring wording” and there had been a “lack of clarity”.

Ms McDonald said the people of Ireland had spoken “very, very definitively” but insisted her party were still “very much” in touch with the public.

“They disregarded the citizens assembly, they didn’t consult with opposition or with other stakeholders. They didn’t collaborate, and they failed to convince,” she said.

“I know, talking to lots of people, that people were left with an unbalanced decision to make and I think it’s a great pity that the government went on this kind of solo run, and they’ve had their answer.”

Ms McDonald added the “big takeaway” from the referendums is support for people with disabilities as full and equals citizens and support for carers is something that has to be taken seriously by government.

Counting started at 09:00 local time with the first results from the 29 count centres expected mid to late afternoon.

Turnout was mixed when polls closed at 22:00 local time on Friday night.

It reached 50% in some parts of the country, but remained below 30% elsewhere.

Senator Michael McDowell, who opposed changes to the constitution, said the results suggested a “no-no substantial margin right across the country”.

Mr McDowell who has served terms as tánaiste (deputy prime minister), justice minister and attorney general, said: “It seems like the government misjudged the mood of the electorate and put before them proposals which they didn’t explain, proposals which could have serious consequences.”

Aontú Leader Peadar Tóibín who also backed the no campaign, said there were high ‘no’ tallies for both referendums.

Mr Tóibín described the amendments as government “virtue signalling” with vague language.

He added:”And the Sinn Féin leadership look marooned from their former support base, from their votes and that’s a very dangerous place for Mary Lou and the Sinn Féin leadership to be.”

Fine Gael Senator Regina Doherty described it as an “insult” to the 100 members of the Citizens Assembly to describe the referendums as virtue signalling.

Those taking part in Friday’s referendum were presented with two ballots – one white and one green – and were asked to vote yes (Tá) or no (Níl).

Senator Tom Clonan described the wording in the care referendum as “toxic” to the fundamental human rights of disabled citizens.

Mr Clonan, who has a 22-year-old disabled son, said he hoped there would now be a conversation about “ableism”.

“The State has been abject in its treatment of disabled citizens. We now have an opportunity to debate that going forward, and find ways to really bring ourselves in line with the rest of Europe and how we vindicate the rights of disabled citizens.

“I’m hoping that this is a watershed moment for disabled citizens.”

Those aged 18 or over and who ordinarily reside in Ireland, Irish citizens and those registered to vote were eligible.

The white ballot asked voters if they want to accept or reject the Thirty-Ninth Amendment of the Constitution Bill – otherwise known as the Family amendment.

The Irish constitution currently offers legal protections to the family unit, but ties the concept of family to the institution of marriage.

The amendment sought to expand the constitutional definition of family to include other “durable relationships” such as unmarried couples and single parent families.

Supporters of the amendment – including the Irish government – said the change would ensure that all family units were recognised equal in the constitution.

However, opponents argued the term “durable relationship” is unclear and could have unintended legal consequences.

The green ballot asked voters to accept or reject the Fortieth Amendment of the Constitution Bill – or the Care amendment.

Currently the Irish constitution – or Bunreacht na hÉireann – says mothers should not have to go out into the workplace to the neglect of their “duties in the home”.

It also states that women’s “life within the home” is a source of support to the state which is necessary for the “common good”.

The amendment asked for both of these articles to be deleted and a new text to be added saying the state “shall strive to support” the provision of family-based care.