Matt Hancock’s reaction to photo of kiss with aide revealed in text leakon March 4, 2023 at 8:39 am

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

The ex-health secretary asked if another minister could emphasise that “no rules have been broken”, texts show.

Matthew Hancock and Gina ColadangeloImage source, Getty Images

Matt Hancock and his staff agonised for hours over whether or not he broke Covid guidance when he kissed his aide, leaked messages in the Telegraph show.

The WhatsApp messages were sent after the Sun newspaper published a photo of Mr Hancock kissing Gina Coladangelo.

His spokesman said there was “nothing new” in the messages and “absolutely no public interest” in publishing them.

“It’s highly intrusive, completely inappropriate and has all been discussed endlessly before,” he added.

The spokesman said the public coronavirus inquiry had been given access to all the messages.

The BBC has not seen or independently verified the messages nor the context in which they were sent.

The latest 41-hour WhatsApp exchange details how the ex-health secretary and Ms Coladangelo were left reeling as the revelations unfolded.

The liaison between the pair provoked strong fury as it showed that Mr Hancock had broke his own lockdown restrictions, which were introduced to curb the spread of Covid.

As he awaited the publication of the photos, he texted a special adviser, asking: “How bad are the pics?”

Reacting to the video of him and the former aide kissing obtained by the Sun, Mr Hancock then said: “Crikey. Not sure there’s much news value in that and I can’t say it’s very enjoyable viewing.”

The messages show Mr Hancock asked his special adviser at the time Damon Poole to “keep the focus” on Ms Coladangelo’s appointment.

Ms Coladangelo worked as a paid adviser for the government, acting as a non-executive director at the Department of Health and Social Care at the time.

The then health secretary also asked if another minister could emphasise that “no rules have been broken”.

Mr Poole asked Mr Hancock and Ms Coladangelo to think “really hard” about whether they could have broken any Covid rules.

Referring to the social distancing rule to keep 1m apart from others when 2m was not possible, Mr Hancock said: “Other than obviously the 1m+ I honestly can’t think of any.”

He added: “The worst they can do is ‘kissed before they legalised hugs’.”

But then Mr Hancock asked his adviser to clarify what exactly the rules were at the time of the photograph.

The two of them then exchanged plans for how they could respond to media coverage.

This ranged from acknowledging he “breached the social distancing rules” – which Matt Hancock said he didn’t think he could do, adding, “I think I just went against the clinical advice” – to saying that “no rules were broken”.

In one exchange, Matt Hancock cited social distancing guidance for workers at the time saying that workers should “maintain social distancing guidelines wherever possible”, to which his adviser responded: “Yes, but it was possible. Clearly. From the picture.”

And in a separate published exchange, Matt Hancock sought the advice of the former chancellor George Osborne about a video statement he was due to put out announcing his resignation.

Mr Osborne said it was “good” but suggests he probably wants to “include the apology to your loved ones you have in the letter”.

He eventually resigned over the matter, publishing a video on his Twitter page.

Jo Tanner, a former adviser to Boris Johnson, said that politicians have a tendency to “think they’re a bit superhuman” when they are asked to apologise for their actions.

“People in these roles can be quite bullish… so actually getting them to be human can be quite a challenge,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “They almost think that they’re a bit superhuman and they can get away with it.

“You can see a bit of that in the approach Matt Hancock was taking.”

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

In a separate leaked conversation, Mr Hancock criticised Rishi Sunak’s Eat Out to Help Out scheme, dubbing it “eat out to help the virus get about”.

The Treasury paid £840m to fund the scheme in August 2020, which offered 50% off food and drink as part of then-Chancellor Mr Sunak’s economic recovery plan after the end of the first Covid lockdown.

In the WhatsApp message exchange from the month of the launch, Mr Hancock said the scheme was”causing problems in our [intervention] areas” – areas that were under additional government restrictions because they had a higher number of Covid cases.

He later said he used the scheme and was “thanked by the other diners”.


The WhatsApp leaks

A collection of more than 100,000 messages sent between former Health Secretary Matt Hancock and other ministers and officials at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic have been obtained by the Telegraph. Here are our stories on the leaks:

- Advertisement -




Pride month: Five stories from around the worldon June 27, 2021 at 12:01 am

From Canada to Uganda, people are celebrating Pride, both as a protest for LGBT rights and as a party.image copyrightAFP via Getty ImagesIn many...

Trump hearing: Judges sceptical as ex-president presents immunity defenceon January 9, 2024 at 7:09 pm

The justice department called the ex-president's claim of total immunity from prosecution "frightening".This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to...

T20 World Cup: Liam Livingstone slides in to take great catch in deepon November 5, 2022 at 8:32 am

Liam Livingstone takes a good catch in the deep to dismiss Kusal Mendis after a fast start for Sri Lanka in the T20 World...

England v South Africa: James Anderson has opener Sarel Erwee caught behind for threeon August 25, 2022 at 10:30 am

James Anderson has South Africa opener Sarel Erwee caught behind cheaply as England make a strong start to the second Test at Old Trafford.James...

Kyle Rittenhouse case: Why it so divides the USon November 19, 2021 at 11:12 pm

Few US trials in recent years have generated such debate and acrimony. Why this one?