Ministers warned about Rwanda’s human rights, court toldon September 5, 2022 at 1:54 pm

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Campaigners are challenging the Home Office’s plan for some cross-Channel migrants.

Migrants being brought to DoverImage source, PA Media

Government documents, advice and experts repeatedly warned ministers about Rwanda’s poor human rights record, the High Court has been told.

Campaigners are challenging the Home Office’s plan to send some cross-Channel migrants to Rwanda.

A second stage to the case is expected to take place in October before the High Court gives its ruling.

In written submissions, lawyers flagged repeated instances of government concerns about the country.

The High Court was told the home secretary and government, including the Foreign Office and Downing Street, were “themselves aware of, and appear to have had serious concerns, over Rwanda’s present and historic human rights record”.

The lawyers said: “Those concerns were articulated repeatedly by public officials.”

They said that in many instances the government had publicly criticised Rwanda for its human rights record, adding: “That was precisely why Rwanda was initially ruled out as a potential candidate for partnership in the planned migration policy.

“These concerns identified within the UK government about Rwanda’s human rights record are not properly or accurately reflected in [government papers defending the scheme].”

Speaking in court, Raza Husain QC, for the migrants, said: “We make no bones about our submission that Rwanda is a one-party authoritarian state that does not tolerate political opposition. It is a regime that repeatedly imprisons tortures and murders those its thinks is its political opponents.

“Those who protest or dissent from government directives, including refugees, are faced with police violence.

“All of those observations are drawn from our own government officials.”

In their submissions, the challengers said Home Secretary Priti Patel had broken the law by failing in her duty to take into account what the government’s own officials had previously reported.

If she had considered those concerns, argue the claimants, the risks of sending anyone to Rwanda “would have been obvious to her”.

The five-day hearing is possibly one of the largest and most complex ever challenges to a government policy.

The government has said its plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda will discourage them from crossing the English Channel.

The policy is aimed at people who arrive in the UK through what ministers call “illegal, dangerous or unnecessary methods”, such as on small boats or hidden in lorries, when they could have claimed asylum in another safe country – such as France.

- Advertisement -

Discover

Sponsor

Latest

Kosovo monastery siege ends after heavy gun battleson September 24, 2023 at 6:41 pm

One officer and three attackers are dead after the gunmen stormed a village near the Serbian border.Image source, ReutersBy Marita MoloneyBBC NewsAt least four...

Conor Benn positive drug tests: Fighter says ‘truth will soon come out’on December 13, 2022 at 9:51 am

Britain's Conor Benn says "the truth will soon come out" following his positive tests for a banned substance.Britain's Conor Benn says "the truth will...

Boris Johnson visits Northern Ireland amid unionist tensionon March 12, 2021 at 2:41 pm

Sinn Féin snubs what it calls a "PR exercise" by Boris Johnson, while the DUP raises NI Protocol concerns.Sinn Féin snubs what it calls...

Will the UK warm to Finland’s naked, sauna diplomacy?on January 19, 2023 at 12:55 am

The Finnish embassy in London allows diplomats to relax while they wrestle with international issues.The Finnish embassy in London allows diplomats to relax while...

England given ‘kick up the bum’ with ‘brutally honest chat’ – Woodon December 22, 2021 at 10:47 am

England's players had a "brutally honest chat" with coach Chris Silverwood after defeat by Australia in the second Ashes Test, says seamer Mark Wood.