Archie Battersbee: European Court of Human Rights turns down parents’ caseon August 3, 2022 at 6:39 pm

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

The 12-year-old’s life support was due to be withdrawn on Wednesday morning.

Archie BattersbeeImage source, Hollie Dance

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has refused an application from Archie Battersbee’s parents to postpone the withdrawal of his life support.

Life-sustaining treatment for the 12-year-old has been in place since April and was due to be withdrawn earlier.

The family applied to the the ECHR after an appeal against the decision to end treatment was refused by the Supreme Court on Tuesday.

But the ECHR said it “would not interfere” with the UK courts’ rulings.

Archie’s mother Hollie Dance said the court’s decision was “another heart-breaking development”.

The 12-year-old was found unconscious at home in Southend-on-Sea, Essex, on 7 April – his mother believes he may have been taking part in an online challenge at the time.

Barts NHS Health Trust, which runs the Royal London Hospital where Archie has been cared for since April, said changes to his treatment would not be made until legal issues were resolved.

Doctors said it was “highly likely” he was brain-stem dead with no chance of recovery and it was in his best interest for life support to end.

A High Court judge previously said continuing treatment was “futile”.

‘Fight to the end’

The ECHR ruling said it would not grant an interim measure to continue treatment and declared Archie’s parents’ complaints “inadmissible”.

The court would only grant such requests “on an exceptional basis” and “when the applicants would otherwise face a real risk of irreversible harm”, it added.

Archie’s parents had argued the plan to withdraw treatment and ignore the concerns of a UN committee would breach a range of human rights safeguards, including right to life and right to a fair trial or hearing.

But the ECHR said it “considered the conditions of admissibility…were not fulfilled”.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Following the ECHR ruling, Ms Dance said: “The NHS, the government and the courts in this country and Europe may have given up on treating him, but we have not.

“We will fight to the end for Archie’s right to live.”

Ms Dance said she had received offers to care for her son from health providers in two other countries – Japan and Italy.

“If this country can’t treat him or they’re not willing to treat him, where is the harm in allowing him to go to another country?” she said.

But Prof Alastair Sutcliffe, Professor of General Paediatrics at UCL, said: “The UK is a world leader in health care and indeed the research behind therapies.

“I am confident no stone has been unturned with regards to treatment, and evidently there is not one. Alas.”

Hollie dance with her son Archie

Image source, Hollie Dance

Before the ECHR ruling was announced, Alistair Chesser, chief medical officer for Barts Health NHS Trust, said: “Our deepest sympathies remain with Archie’s family and we aim to provide the best possible support to everyone at this difficult time.

“As directed by the courts, we will work with the family to prepare for the withdrawal of treatment, but we will make no changes to Archie’s care until the outstanding legal issues are resolved.”

Court of Appeal judges had previously ruled his life-sustaining treatment should not continue beyond 12:00 on Tuesday.

Paul Battersbee and Hollie Dance

Image source, PA Media

But this was delayed while the Supreme Court heard an appeal application from Archie’s parents.

The family had asked that court to assess whether more time should be given for the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to look at the case.

But it said the Court of Appeal had “made the correct decision”.

A previous High Court ruling heard “every bodily function [of Archie’s] is now maintained by artificial means”, while another heard he had not “regained awareness at any time”.

line

Timeline: How the story unfolded

7 April 2022

Archie is found unconscious by his mother after an incident at their home in Essex. He is taken to Southend Hospital.

8 April

Archie is transferred to The Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel where he has been treated ever since.

26 April

The NHS trust that runs the Royal London starts High Court proceedings asking for Archie to undergo brain stem testing.

13 May

Mrs Justice Arbuthnot rules that brain stem testing should be carried out.

16 May

Two specialists try to administer brain stem function tests, but they are unable to as Archie did not respond to a peripheral nerve stimulation test, a precursor to the brain stem test.

25 May

A hearing is held to decide if further MRI scans should be conducted. Archie’s parents did not consent on the basis that moving Archie could harm him.

27 May

The court approves further MRI scans, which are carried out on 31 May.

6-8 June

A final hearing is held to hear evidence on whether Archie’s life-support treatment should continue.

13 June

The High Court judge rules that Archie is “dead” based on MRI scan results and that treatment could be withdrawn.

Hollie Dance, Archie’s mother, outside the High Court

20 June

The family ask the Court of Appeal to reconsider the case.

29 June

The Court of Appeal says that a new hearing to determine Archie’s best interests should take place.

11 July

A new hearing is held in the High Court with evidence given before Mr Justice Hayden.

15 July

Mr Justice Hayden rules that life-support treatment should end, saying continuing it is “futile”.

25 July

Three Court of Appeal judges support the High Court ruling that treatment can end.

28 July

The Supreme Court rules out intervening in the case and supports the Court of Appeal ruling.

29 July

The family make an application to the United Nations.

Archie’s mother and father, Paul Battersbee, outside the Royal London Hospital

30 July

A UN Committee writes to the UK government asking for a delay in withdrawing treatment while they consider the case.

31 July

The government asks for an urgent hearing to review the case.

1 August

The Court of Appeal refuses to postpone withdrawal of treatment until the UN can hear the case.

2 August

The Supreme Court refuse the family’s application for permission to appeal the Court of Appeal ruling.

3 August

The family submit an application to the European Court of Human Rights in a bid to postpone the withdrawal of Archie’s life support.

presentational grey line

Find BBC News: East of England on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. If you have a story suggestion email eastofenglandnews@bbc.co.uk

- Advertisement -

Discover

Sponsor

Latest

It’s Not Just You, Seed Rounds Are Actually Getting Bigger

Like our yellow stripey friends, the bees, seed funding rounds are small and numerous. And, like bees, an individual seed round is likely to...

Prince Harry condemns ‘dangerous spin’ about his Taliban commentson January 11, 2023 at 2:03 am

Responding for the first time to coverage of his book, the prince accuses some of "lies".Image source, WPA PoolPrince Harry has said claims he...

UK inflation: Food prices ‘worryingly high’ as sugar and milk soaron May 24, 2023 at 10:53 am

Food prices in the UK are still rising at their fastest rate in nearly 45 years, even as inflation eases.Image source, Getty ImagesFood prices...

Last-minute Smith penalty gives England dramatic win over world champions South Africaon November 20, 2021 at 5:29 pm

England sign off on 2021 in style as they outfox and outfight 2019 Rugby World Cup final conquerors South Africa in front of a...

Southampton 3-1 Fulham: Che Adams, Nathan Tella & Theo Walcott earn Saints back-to-back winson May 15, 2021 at 6:12 pm

Ralph Hasenhuttl called Nathan Tella the "biggest talent" at Southampton's disposal after the striker scored his first senior goal in Saturday's 3-1 victory over...