Edward Colston statue case sent to Court of Appealon April 12, 2022 at 11:44 pm

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

The Attorney General is seeking clarification of the law after the Colston case leads to “uncertainty”.

Statue thrown in the harbour

Image source, PA Media

The acquittal of four people on trial for toppling Bristol’s Edward Colston statue has prompted the Attorney General to contact the Court of Appeal.

Suella Braverman is seeking clarification of the law around what can be used as a defence to criminal charges arising from protests.

She said the Colston case has led to “uncertainty” and asked for clarification on human rights defences.

The referral will not affect the acquittals in the case.

Milo Ponsford, 26, Rhian Graham, 30, Jake Skuse, 33, and Sage Willoughby, 22, were charged with criminal damage after the memorial to the slave trader was toppled on 7 June 2020.

(Left to right) Sage Willoughby, Jake Skuse, Milo Ponsford and Rhian Graham outside Bristol Crown Court

Image source, PA Media

They were cleared after a trial but the verdict prompted a debate about the criminal justice system after the defendants opted to stand trial in front of a jury and did not deny involvement in the incident.

The defendants claimed in court that the presence of a statue of a man involved in the slave trade was a hate crime and it was therefore not an offence to remove it.

The prosecution argued it was “irrelevant” who Colston was and the case was one of straightforward criminal damage.

The statue was stamped on after it was pulled down

Image source, PA Media

Ms Braverman has contacted the Court of Appeal concerning the scope of defences that can be used for criminal charges arising from protests and the directions which should be given to juries.

She said the case has caused uncertainty between the offence of criminal damage and the right to protest peacefully.

The Court of Appeal will be asked to clarify the law around whether someone can use a defence related to their human rights when they are accused of criminal damage.

‘Guardian of liberty’

“After careful consideration, I have decided to refer the Colston statue case to the Court of Appeal to clarify the law around protests,” said Ms Braverman.

“Trial by jury is an important guardian of liberty and critical to that are the legal directions given to the jury.

“It is in the public interest to clarify the points of law raised in these cases for the future.

“This is a legal matter which is separate from the politics of the case involved,” she added.

Presentational grey line

Follow BBC West on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Send your story ideas to: bristol@bbc.co.uk

- Advertisement -

Discover

Sponsor

Latest

Iran protests: Jailed activist Sepideh Qolian describes brutality in letteron January 11, 2023 at 12:21 am

Sepideh Qolian tells how confessions are extracted from detainees, in a rare letter from Evin prison.Image source, Sepideh QolianBy Feranak AmidiBBC World ServiceOne of...

Ukraine: Volodymyr Zelensky invokes Winston Churchill as he appeals to MPson March 8, 2022 at 6:24 pm

Ukrainian president calls for Russia to be recognised as a "terrorist state" in a speech to the Commons.Image source, UK ParliamentVolodymyr Zelensky has called...

Key points in the Autumn Statementon November 22, 2023 at 5:54 pm

Here's what you need to know about Chancellor Jeremy Hunt's tax and spending plans for the year ahead.Here's what you need to know about...

World Snooker Championship 2022: Judd Trump stages superb fightback against Ronnie O’Sullivanon May 2, 2022 at 3:34 pm

Judd Trump stages a superb fightback to move back to within three frames of Ronnie O'Sullivan at 14-11 in the World Championship final.

Stephen Tompkinson trial: Actor ’caused traumatic brain injuries’on May 3, 2023 at 3:35 pm

The DCI Banks star confronted a man who was drunkenly making noise outside his home, a jury hears.Image source, PA MediaActor Stephen Tompkinson caused...