Moon crash: Discarded rocket part to hit Moon in hours, say scientistson March 4, 2022 at 12:23 am

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

The space junk has confused experts but is soon to crash at high speed leaving a crater on the Moon.

The rocket booster can be seen tracking across the sky right-to-left

Image source, Peter Birtwhistle

A discarded part of a rocket is hours away from crashing into the Moon, say scientists who first predicted the collision in January.

The three-tonne rocket part, which is hurtling through space at 5,800mph, is expected to hit at 12:25 on Friday.

Astronomers first thought the rocket part had been launched by Elon Musk’s SpaceX programme then said it was Chinese, something China denies.

The effects of the impact on the Moon are expected to be minor.

Scientists hope to study the 10-20m-wide crater and the plumes of moon dust created upon impact.

The rocket part was first sighted from Earth in March 2015. A Nasa-funded space survey in Arizona spotted it, but quickly lost interest when the object was shown not to be an asteroid.

The rocket part is what’s known as space junk – hardware discarded from missions or satellites without enough fuel or energy to return to Earth. Some pieces are closer to us, just above the Earth, but others, like this booster, are thousands of miles away in high orbit, far from the Earth’s atmosphere.

The European Space Agency estimates there are now 36,500 pieces of space junk larger than 10cm.

No space programme or university formally tracks deep space junk. Monitoring space is expensive and the risks to humans from high-orbit debris are low.

So, it falls to a tiny handful of volunteer astronomers who spend their free time making calculations and estimating orbits. They fire emails and alerts back and forth, asking whoever is in the best location on the planet to spot an object in space.

Six weeks after the booster was first seen, Peter Birtwhistle, 63, was watching the skies for asteroids from his garden in Newbury, in the south of England.

His telescope picked up a tiny dot of light tracking across the sky. Calculations suggested it was part of a rocket, he told BBC News.

Space junk drops in and out of view, often unpredictably. For seven years, he barely saw the rocket part – until in January, it re-appeared.

“I grabbed some images when it passed close to Earth,” he explained.

He sent his pictures to astronomer and data scientist Bill Gray, on the east coast of the United States. He is the expert who went on to identify it as a SpaceX booster heading for the Moon.

News that a discarded part of one of billionaire Elon Musk’s space missions was going to strike the Moon made global headlines.

But tracking space junk is often “detective work,” Mr Gray explains. The rocket insignia cannot be seen – astronomers have to piece together its identity by tracking its route backwards through space. They then match its orbit to dates and locations of rocket launches and trajectories.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

But some space missions, including China’s, don’t publicise their routes.

“For a Chinese mission, we know the launch date because they are televised. So I take a guess that it’s going to get to the Moon – usually in four or five days. Then I compute an approximate orbit,” Mr Gray explains.

And sometimes he makes mistakes. Weeks after the SpaceX identification, another observer sent Mr Gray new data, revealing that his identification was impossible.

He ran the numbers again and concluded it was the third stage of a rocket from China’s lunar mission Chang’e 5-T1, launched in October 2014.

The debris may have come from a rocket like this one built by SpaceX

Image source, Getty Images

China denied this, saying the upper-stage had re-entered the Earth’s atmosphere and burned up.

Mr Gray is sticking to his prediction. He believes China has mixed up the tracking of two rocket parts. “I’m 99.9% sure it’s the China 5-T1,” he says.

In reality, we will never be sure.

Prof of Astronautics Hugh Lewis at Southampton University says the scientific value of tracking deep space junk is limited. But he says it’s important to “keep an eye on what’s there”, especially as human settlement in spaces becomes more likely.

“It’s the mess we’ve created. Objects that we think are safe can actually return to Earth unexpectedly,” he says.

Wherever it came from, we won’t see the last moments of the booster’s existence when it smashes into the far side of the Moon.

It could be days or even weeks before it can be confirmed. This will happen when two satellites going around the Moon photograph the crater left on impact.

And as the booster breaks into thousands of pieces, evidence of its true origins will be lost, too. The best we’ve got are the estimates made by Bill Gray and the volunteer astronomers watching the skies.

- Advertisement -




Energy crisis: UK expands gas emergency exercise ahead of winteron August 23, 2022 at 8:33 am

The annual drill will run for four days this year but the government downplays energy supply fears.Image source, Getty ImagesAn emergency planning exercise has...

Eve Muirhead retires from curling as Olympic, European and world mixed doubles championon August 11, 2022 at 3:56 pm

Olympic, European and world mixed doubles champion Eve Muirhead retires from curling saying he hopes she showed "girls that being sweaty's cool".Olympic, European and...

Kenya election 2022: Raila Odinga rejects William Ruto’s victoryon August 16, 2022 at 1:28 pm

Raila Odinga, who came second in the presidential election, says the process was a travesty.Image source, ReutersRaila Odinga has rejected the results of Kenya's...

The White House predicts that up to 240,000 Americans will die of coronavirus

The White House released its first official models of the course of the coronavirus, and the C.D.C. said it was reviewing its guidance on...

Fact-checking Russian claims about Bucha killingson April 4, 2022 at 5:50 pm

Russia called footage of bodies in Bucha "staged" but its evidence for this does not stack up.