A mink may have infected a second Dutch worker with coronavirus, agriculture minister says

- Advertisement -

Dutch authorities cordoned off two mink farms in the southern Netherlands after tests showed animals had been infected with the new coronavirus, likely via human contact..

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Getty Images

The Dutch agriculture ministry said on Monday that a second worker has likely been infected with coronavirus on a mink farm, but stressed that the risk of further contagion remains very low.

In a letter to parliament, Carola Schouten, minister of agriculture, nature and food quality, said a second case has become known in which SARS-CoV-2 was passed from a mink to a human on one of the farms where the animals are bred for fur.

But Schouten said that the Dutch health authorities believe the risk of human exposure to the virus outside the barns where the mink were being kept was “negligible.”

On April 26, the Dutch government reported that mink on two farms in the south of the country had been found to have the virus, triggering a wider investigation.

Last week, the government reported its first suspected case of mink-to-human transmission. As a result Schouten and health minister Hugo de Jonge introduced new measures, including screening mink at all farms in the Netherlands for antibodies and requirements for staff members to wear protective equipment.

There have been several cases of infections in animals since the pandemic went global. News in February that a Hong Kong pet dog had tested “weak-positive” for COVID-19 sparked panic that domestic dogs and cats could be transmitters of the virus.

On April 5, a tiger at the Bronx Zoo in New York tested positive for coronavirus after developing a respiratory illness, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said.

But health experts have repeatedly sought to reassure the public that people and pets cannot pass the coronavirus to one another.

Both the World Organisation for Animal Health, based in France, and the CDC have said there is no evidence that companion animals such as cats and dogs can spread the virus. “Therefore, there is no justification in taking measures against companion animals which may compromise their welfare,” the animal-health organization said.

This article was originally published on marketwatch.com.

Home of Science
Follow me

- Advertisement -

Discover

Sponsor

Latest

How to Find the Best Provider

The name Sabre Corporation is a trademark of the Sabre Corporation, Inc. founded in 1983 and the parent company is Sabre Corporation. Sabre Corporation...

Big oil might really see a decade of change in one year

When the industry is in secular decline, recessions accelerate trends. A common phrase that has become received business wisdom in this pandemic crisis is that...

Simple Ways to Make More Money Online

Money is the lifeblood of society. It is a fact that money helps in creating businesses and creating jobs. You see, there are some...

Coronavirus: Colleges experiment with stay-at-home ‘study abroad’ programs

KEY POINTS Many college and university students who were already on study abroad programs when coronavirus travel bans were enacted have been stranded all...

This 38-year-old retired in the Arizona desert with his wife: How coronavirus changed life in early retirement

Our off-grid home in the Arizona desert Steve Adcock You’d think that, for a couple who retired in their 30s and lives in a small town — in the...
Home of Science
Follow me